Necessity of blending causes naught but madness sending.
As a residing student of the University of Southern Mississippi in Mississippi, my goal has always been to examine the human psychology. Like all adolescents and young adults, the time I experienced in these periods exposed me drastically to egocentrism and a renewed infatuation with one’s self, ranging from a zit in your teens to the path one will ultimately choose as they maneuver throughout college and the work force. Therefore, as my first document of true work in my life, I am starting on the research I have the most experience with. Discussed within are the techniques, theories, methods, and results I have culminated on fear-based research in adolescence and young adulthood. By fear-based I mean, the change in behavior or thoughts in response to a socially induced flight instinct. That statement alone says a lot about my technique as a psychologist, student, and human. I have a hypothesis that fear is socially learned, leaning towards the nurture side. At the same time, I believe biology and the sympathetic nervous system exist for a reason and that emotions do not directly correlate with how one’s biology “feels” at the time. As I sit and think about what to write next…I suddenly realize, I’m thinking about what I write. Why do I think? Because I want to put out a respectable paper? How do I create a successful paper? One has other experts look at and accept their research. So why want to put out a respectable paper? To prove one is right? Hubris, in the non-sex allegory, is what strikes me as fascinating. So, let’s go one step further into this illogically logical argument. If emotions are learned, and hubris is the downfall of man, might a lack of emotion and feeling have the contradictory value? That is, All A are B = All H are D. Might a change to Some A are not B = Some H are not D? That is, if some emotions are not learned then some hubris is not the downfall of man? Hypothetically, on a sociological note, we could then, as a human race, try to find the “good hubris” and use it to our advantage to become prosperous as a planet. This is what gives an agnostic hope for all of those who can’t fathom how atheists or those who’s lives aren’t concerned with “God” still has motivation for anything in life. This in turn may create prosperity, not an anarchic world believed to possibly take place if the world were full of “non-believers”.
At this point in time, I would like to point out that, unlike my title, this book is not going to be exactly what it seems. All things I mentioned in the first paragraph will be included, however the true purpose of these words is for the exploration of all levels; from foreign language, domestic trade, & government, to art, music, history, sex, culture, etc. There are so many scopes in this world that so few people choose to peer through. Some prefer non-fiction sports memoirs, some fictional folklore. Some prefer Chinua Achebe, others Dennis Lehane, while some of you reading this won’t know who either are. This world is not formatted or fit into a specific arrangement. As a philosopher, I tribute my book’s lack of order to the disorder of life. Try to keep up; I have done studies and research with thousands of people in over 5 continents. Do people still count Antarctica when talking about population and research? I mean, it can be misleading to say only 5 of 7 continents studied when one of them is uninhabited. Someone might close their mind entirely to the idea simply because of the lack of 100% validity…we all know one of those people.
